Imagine that it were a line with numbers ..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ... where -1 would be yesterday, -2 day before yesterday, 0 right now, 1 tomorrow and so on.
Just for the having the mental picture, imagine that the line got bended at the point 0, so that -1 overlaps 1, -2 overlaps 2 and so on. It does not mean that tomorrow is happening at the same time as yesterday (for example). However, it means that once the line overlaps, from the point 0 you can go only in one direction. With physical laws that are created and meant to function "at all times" under given circumstances, what you do is bending that line. Therefore, when you say "Ball is accelerating toward the ground" it does not matter whether it is yesterday, now or tomorrow. What matters is that you have bended that line and going only in one direction, away from 0, denoted by the word "accelerating".
If ball could exist in past and present at the same time where the line is bent, then you would say that it was going backward in past (away from "now") and toward in future (away from "now"). In both situations, it was reaching the ground. Since it cannot be reaching the ground in both situations (knowing that as you go toward the past, further away from the ground the ball was), then it means that a thing cannot exist in future and past at the same time. Perhaps things could oscilate between future and past, but they cannot exist in both. If they oscilate, according to things that I have said, it means that event which you use as a marker of time is put in a loop, thus oscilation is possible. If it oscilates and moves in one direction, away or toward the 0, then there are many loops of the time marker/s.
As you go on a bent line in one direction only, try to imagine that line as a straight line again. "Ball is accelerating toward the ground" is assuming that past, present and future do not matter, thus it acts as a dimension on its own. So, the presentation of the line becomes a line with time markers and a half-sphere with a center at 0 that changes its radius depending on "what is going on". If event is closer to "now" the radius of the half-sphere is smaller. If event is further away from now, radius of the half-sphere is greater. Reason why I represented is as a spere is simply because there are imaginary objects/situations/numbers/entities that can be taken into account, thus they contribute to the full spectra of the dimension that is introduced by "Ball is accelerating toward the ground". Lets say that above the line denoting time you have a sphere representing actual events, and below, a sphere representing imaginary events.
What I like about this idea is that you can observe more things at once, or fold the time-line at different points and get more spheres. With many of such spheres, the general dimension becomes represented as a wave, and this I will use to make a comment concerning the communication between past and future.
Recall the bent line again. What happens when you bend it again, lets say at some point that represents identical events of past and future? For example, my monitor was monitor yesterday and will be a monitor tomorrow, so that is where the bent line is bent. For now, I would like to ignore the 0 that represents the "now", and assume that we bended the line very far away from the 0. You would be observing four lines, where one identical event is where the bent line was bent again (which is a monitor). From that point, you can only go in one direction. Going in that direction, and oscilating between the lines is what happens when past and future communicate. How would going in that one direction look on the line that is completely unfolded? It would look like a wave, meaning that you had to have imaginary entities somewhere along the line.
Simply to conclude all of this, having the wave as a dimension that represents "Ball is accelerating toward the ground" means that in order to use the ball as the communication device between the past and future, you have to know the past as well as the future, simply because you had to have imaginary entities introduced. So, to communicate between the past and the future, you would have to be able to know the future, meaning, you would have to be able to predict the future to get rid of imaginary entities.
However, the future is not predictable (in a way that there are no imaginary entities) since there are always too many variables to consider, thus there is no communication between the future and the past.
I hope this makes some sense at least.
Thanks [for beer]. These were just my thoughts, nothing that I have researched, checked or critically analyzed. I could be completely wrong. Maybe I will change my opinion, but this is how I think right now.
just got out from work and I'm so bored that's why i have nothing to do and just made my none sense blog...but try to think it over...
No comments:
Post a Comment